British Museum · 1986,0501.1 · made around 200 AD

The oldest image of Jesus Christ crucified, with His titles engraved around it

A Christian in Syria or Asia Minor wore this stone in a ring, some 1,800 years ago. It shows Jesus Christ on the cross, and the first words engraved next to Him are these:

ΥΙΕ ΠΑΤΗΡ ΙΗΣΟΥ ΧΡΙΣΤΕ
"O Son, Father, O Jesus Christ"
Lines 1 to 3 of the gem1
The Pereire Gem: a dark red and black stone showing a crucified man on a tall cross, with Greek capital letters left and right of him. A centimetre scale shows it is about 3 cm tall.
The front of the gem. Photo © The Trustees of the British Museum, licence CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. I added the centimetre scale; this version is shared under the same licence. See it in the museum's database.
3 cmtall, the size of a thumbnail
~ 200 ADbetween about 170 and 2302
1 figureJesus Christ, crucified
9 linesof Greek, all about Him
Why it matters

Three records on one small stone

The oldest image of Jesus Christ on the cross

The next Christian images of the crucifixion come from Rome, around 420 to 430 AD: a wooden church door and a small ivory panel. This stone is about 200 years older.3

One drawing in Rome may be just as old, but it was scratched on a wall by a mocker and gives the crucified man a donkey's head.

The oldest "Jesus Christ" written out in full

ΙΗΣΟΥ ΧΡΙΣΤΕ

The early Bible manuscripts shorten the holy names to two letters with a line above. Here the full name stands in stone. I noticed this as a teenager, about 25 years ago, and I have said it ever since. If you know an older example, please show me.

The oldest Alpha and Omega for Christ

Α Ω Α Ω Α Ω Α Ω

Follow the letters Α and Ω through the middle lines: Alpha, Omega, four times in a row. Stephen P. Laurie was, as far as I know, the first to publish this, and to say that it is clearly intentional. I cherish his work for that.4

"Oldest" always means: the oldest that has survived and that we know of today.

The first three lines

It calls Jesus Christ both Son and Father

There is one person in the picture: Christ on the cross. All the titles are addressed to Him. "O Son, Father, O Jesus Christ" means to say: He who is Son and Father is Jesus Christ.

The apostle John writes in the same way. He pairs Jesus with Christ, and the Son with the Father, and he tells us that whoever has the Son has the Father also. The gem says it in four words.

The Scriptures had prepared every one of these words. The child that is born to us is called "The everlasting Father" (Isaiah 9:6). Jesus says: "he that hath seen me hath seen the Father" (John 14:9), and "I and my Father are one" (John 10:30).

On the gem, around 200 AD

ΥΙΕO Son→ΠΑΤΗΡFather
ΙΗΣΟΥO Jesus→ΧΡΙΣΤΕChrist

1 John 2:22-23

"Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. [...] he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also."

The ancient world had one word for this

υἱοπάτωρ Huiopatōr = "Son-Father"

"O Son, Father" on the gem is almost one to one this word. The old writers use it when they describe the believers who confessed Christ as the one God. About Noetus of Smyrna, who taught around 180 to 200 AD, we read:

"He taught Christ as the Son-Father".

Epiphanius, Panarion, summary of sect 57 (υἱοπάτορα τὸν Χριστὸν ἐδίδαξε)5

This faith is called Monarchian, from monarchia, "one rule": God is one, and Jesus Christ is that one God, both visible and invisible, in heaven and on earth. Today many call it Oneness.

A scholar has seen this on the gem before me. In 2014 Attilio Mastrocinque, who catalogued the magical gems of the French National Library, wrote about the Pereire Gem:

"Personne ne s'est aperçu, jusqu'à présent, qu'il s'agit d'une définition typique du monarchianisme."

"Nobody has noticed until now that this is a typical definition of Monarchianism." Mastrocinque 20146

He still worked with an older reading of the first word ("one Father"). The corrected reading, "O Son, Father", says it even more clearly. Roy Kotansky, who gave us the best edition of the text, does not follow Mastrocinque here. Look at the witnesses below and judge for yourself.

The church around the gem

Around 210 AD, this was the faith of most Christians

The simple believers, "who always constitute the majority of believers", say: "We maintain the Monarchy."

Tertullian, Against Praxeas 3, about 213 AD. He wrote against them, and he admits they were the majority.7

The gem was made in exactly these decades. In Rome, bishop Zephyrinus said in public: "I know that there is one God, Jesus Christ". In Smyrna, Noetus was asked why he taught this way, and he answered: "What evil, then, am I doing in glorifying Christ?"8

Until the days of Callistus I know of no bishop who wrote against this faith, and of none who is clearly trinitarian. The early leaders are either clearly Monarchian, or they say things that fit the Monarchian faith best. Here they are on one line, with the gem among them.

The witnesses, in their own words

Dates are approximate. Where we only have the words through an opponent, I say so.

88-99 AD
Clement of Rome
Bishop of Rome
Christ Himself "through the Holy Spirit thus invites us: Come, my children, hearken unto Me".
1 Clement 22:1. Christ calls us His children.
~ 110 AD
Ignatius of Antioch
Bishop of Antioch in Syria
"Begotten and unbegotten, God in man [...] our God, Jesus the Christ". He is "the Invisible, who for our sake became visible".
To the Ephesians 7:2, 18:2; To Polycarp 3:2
~ 90-140 AD
Hermas
Rome, brother of bishop Pius
"For that Spirit is the Son of God."
The Shepherd, Parable 9, 1:1
~ 110-155 AD
Polycarp of Smyrna
Bishop of Smyrna, disciple of John
"He who raised Him up from the dead will raise up us also" and: "the Lord [...] will raise us again from the dead".
To the Philippians 2 and 5. The One who raises is one.
before 150 AD
"2 Clement"
An early sermon, author unknown
"Think of Jesus Christ as of God [...] He spake to us as a father to his sons."
2 Clement 1:1, 1:4
~ 160-170 AD
Melito of Sardis
Bishop of Sardis
"In that He begets, He is Father; in that He is begotten, He is Son."
On the Passover 9
~ 180 AD
Theophilus of Antioch
Bishop of Antioch in Syria
God said "Let Us make man" to "no one else than to His own Word and wisdom".
To Autolycus 2.18. Word and Wisdom belong to the one God Himself.
~ 180 AD
Irenaeus of Lyons
Bishop of Lyons, from Smyrna
Man was "moulded by His hands, that is, by the Son and Holy Spirit".
Against Heresies 4, preface 4. Son and Spirit as the hands of one God.
~ 180-200 AD
Noetus of Smyrna
Teacher in Smyrna
"Christ was the Father Himself".
Reported by his opponent Hippolytus, Against Noetus 1
199-217 AD
Zephyrinus
Bishop of Rome
"I know that there is one God, Jesus Christ; nor except Him do I know any other that is begotten and amenable to suffering."
Reported by his opponent Hippolytus, Refutation 9
217-222 AD
Callistus I
Bishop of Rome
"The Father is not one person and the Son another, but they are one and the same".
Reported by his opponent Hippolytus, Refutation 9
~ 213 AD · the opponent
Tertullian
Writer in Carthage, not a bishop
They "always constitute the majority of believers".
Against Praxeas 3

Look at where these men lived: Antioch, Smyrna, Sardis, Rome, Lyons. Smyrna and Sardis are two of the seven churches of the book of Revelation. The gem comes from the same world.

Read the stone yourself

Nine lines of Greek. The cross runs through the middle.

The words are written without spaces, as was normal then. The upright beam of the cross cuts most lines into a left and a right half. Lines 1 to 3 and 7 to 9 are plain Greek. Lines 4 to 6 are the riddle. Tap through the layers.

O Son,
Father,
O Jesus Christ,
Alpha and Omega,
unblemished Lamb,
Amen, Maryah,
O crossbeam
of the redeeming
Son!

My drawing of the text, after Kotansky's edition.1 A dot under a letter means: hard to read on the stone. Not to scale.

Where the words come from

Almost every title is in the last chapter of the Bible

Read Revelation 22 next to the gem. The same names meet there: the Lamb, the Alpha and Omega, the Root and the Offspring, the Amen, the Lord.

Alpha and OmegaΑ Ω × 4
↔
Revelation 22:13"I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last."
The Lambἀμνὸς ἄμωμος
↔
Revelation 22:3"the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him". One throne, and they serve Him.
Son and FatherΥΙΕ ΠΑΤΗΡ
↔
Revelation 22:16"I Jesus [...] am the root and the offspring of David". The root is before David, the offspring comes from him (Isaiah 11:1, 11:10).
Amen my readingΑΜΝ
↔
Revelation 3:14 and 22:20"These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness". And: "Surely I come quickly. Amen."
Maryah, the LORD my readingΜΑΡΙΑ
↔
Revelation 22:20"Even so, come, Lord Jesus." The first Christians prayed this in Aramaic: Maranatha, "our Lord, come" (1 Corinthians 16:22).
The crossa Τ, the letter Tau
↔
Ezekiel 9:4The mark on the foreheads of those who are saved is the Hebrew letter Tav, in the old script a cross.
The picture

Tied with ropes. Naked. Alive.

The engraver knew what a Roman crucifixion looked like. And he shows Christ as the victor: head up, body upright, no sign of defeat.

The bones agree

In 1968 the bones of a crucified man, Jehohanan, were found in Jerusalem. An iron nail of 11.5 cm was still in his heel. His legs were bent to one side, and his arms show no nail wounds: they were tied to the beam. The gem shows the same: legs to one side, wrists tied.11

Rome stripped its victims

Later Christian art gives Christ a loincloth or a robe. The gem shows the cross as it was. Shame was part of the punishment, and here it is turned into a sign of victory.

A cross like the letter T

The cross is a tall post with a beam on top, a Tau. The last words of the gem speak to this beam: "O crossbeam of the redeeming Son".

The object

Somebody wore this on a finger

The edge of the stone is cut at an angle, so that it fits into a ring, and it has no hole for a cord. In a ring, part of the writing disappears in the setting. Campbell Bonner, the great expert on such gems, wrote that the inscription then became "the wearer's secret".12

So these words were written for one believer and for God. They were never meant to win a debate, and this is why I trust them.

Christians of that time did wear rings with signs of their faith. Clement of Alexandria, around 200 AD, tells them what to engrave: a dove, a fish, a ship, an anchor (Paedagogus 3.11).

"Engraved" is the exact word. A gem cutter did not scratch or carve. He ground the picture and each letter into the hard stone with a small turning drill and fine sand.

Where it is
British Museum, London, number 1986,0501.1
Size
30 × 25 × 6 mm
Stone
Jasper, dark with red patches (bloodstone)
Date
About 170 to 230 AD, judged from the style
Made in
The eastern Mediterranean, most likely Syria or Asia Minor
Languages there
Greek and Aramaic, side by side
History
Collection of Roger Pereire, Paris. Published 1964. Bought by the museum in 1986.
Best edition
Roy Kotansky, 2017, free to read online1

Nobody knows where it was found. It came through the art market. The back has a second inscription that I leave aside here.

Questions people ask me

Fair questions, short answers

Jesus spoke Aramaic. Should it not be "Aleph and Tau"?

The gem comes from a region that was mixed, Greek and Aramaic, in the 2nd and 3rd centuries. And the gem is written in Greek letters. So even if there is Aramaic on it, and I believe there is (Amen and Maryah), we expect the letters to follow the Greek alphabet, just as the seven vowels on the gem stand in Greek alphabet order.

The picture of "first and last letter" is also stronger in Greek. In Hebrew and Aramaic the names of the letters are real words with their own meaning: Aleph is an ox, Tav is a mark. Alpha and Omega are simply the first and the last.

Could line 5 be the name "Mary"?

In Greek letters the name Maria and the Aramaic title Maryah look the same. But every other word on this side of the stone is a title of Christ, and the stone names nobody else. A title of Christ in the centre continues what the stone does from the first line to the last.

Is this a magic amulet?

It belongs to a family of small engraved stones that scholars call "magical gems", and the row of seven vowels is typical for them. But this stone asks for nothing: no healing, no protection, no curse. It only praises Christ. Kotansky himself calls the front "less magical than usually understood".9

Could it be a fake?

It has been known since before 1964. The seven vowels were first recognised in 2017, and the reading "O Son" not long before that. A forger would have had to hide things on the stone that nobody could read for fifty years, and then tell nobody. The museum and the specialists treat it as ancient.

How sure is the date?

The date comes from the style of the cutting and the letters. The British Museum says 2nd to 3rd century. Kotansky says late 2nd or early 3rd century. It could be some decades later. Even then it is far older than any other Christian image of the crucifixion, and it still falls in the time of the Monarchian majority.

Certain

  • The stone, its place in the British Museum, and its age within some decades
  • "O Son, Father, O Jesus Christ" as the first words
  • Alpha and Omega in a row, the seven vowels, the Lamb, the crossbeam
  • What the bishops and teachers on the timeline wrote

My reading

  • That the gem is a Monarchian confession. Mastrocinque saw it first; I am convinced of it.
  • That the early leaders on the timeline confess the one God in Christ
  • Amen and Maryah in the centre. This I hold with an open hand until the study is published.

The message of the stone is clear: Jesus Christ, He who was crucified, is the Alpha and Omega, the unblemished Lamb, the Amen, the LORD. He who is Son, and Father.

Sources

Notes and sources

  1. Roy Kotansky, "The Magic 'Crucifixion Gem' in the British Museum", Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 57 (2017), pages 631-659; the Greek text is on page 636. Free at grbs.library.duke.edu. The reading "O Son" was first proposed by Jeffrey Spier, Late Antique and Early Christian Gems (Wiesbaden: Reichert, 2007), no. 443.
  2. British Museum, collection online, object 1986,0501.1: "2ndC-3rdC", made in the eastern Mediterranean. Kotansky: "the late second or early third century C.E."
  3. The door panel of Santa Sabina in Rome and the ivory panel British Museum 1856,0623.5, both about 420 to 430 AD. The wall drawing is the Alexamenos graffito from the Palatine in Rome, usually dated around 200 AD.
  4. Stephen P. Laurie, "The Mysteries of the Crucifixion Gem", Jesus Origins, 2020, jesusorigins.com/mysteries-of-the-crucifixion-gem.
  5. The short summaries (Anakephalaiosis) handed down with the Panarion of Epiphanius, on sect 57, the Noetians. The word huiopatōr is also in the letter of Arius quoted by Athanasius, De Synodis 16, and in Epiphanius, Panarion 69.7. We only have the word from opponents.
  6. Attilio Mastrocinque, Les intailles magiques du département des Monnaies, Médailles et Antiques (Paris: Bibliothèque nationale de France, 2014), pages 193-194. ISBN 978-2-7177-2608-4.
  7. Tertullian, Against Praxeas 3, translation of the Ante-Nicene Fathers, volume 3.
  8. Hippolytus, Refutation of All Heresies, book 9 (Zephyrinus and Callistus), and Against Noetus 1; translations of the Ante-Nicene Fathers, volume 5. Both bishops and Noetus are quoted by Hippolytus, who was their opponent.
  9. Kotansky 2017 (note 1): the seven vowels, the "unblemished lamb", the crossbeam, and his judgement that the front is "less magical than usually understood".
  10. Eusebius of Caesarea, Praeparatio Evangelica 11.6.36-37, already quoted by Kotansky 2017, page 642 (in the translation of E. H. Gifford, Oxford 1903). The translation here is my own. Greek: τῶν ἑπτὰ φωνηέντων τὴν ἐπὶ τὸ αὐτὸ σύνθεσιν μιᾶς τινος ἀπορρήτου προσηγορίας περιέχειν φασὶν ἐκφώνησιν, ἣν διὰ τεσσάρων στοιχείων παῖδες Ἑβραίων σημειούμενοι [...]. The verse: ἑπτά με φωνήεντα θεὸν μέγαν ἄφθιτον αἰνεῖ γράμματα, τὸν πάντων ἀκάματον πατέρα.
  11. Nicu Haas, Israel Exploration Journal 20 (1970), pages 38-59; Joseph Zias and Eliezer Sekeles, Israel Exploration Journal 35 (1985), pages 22-27.
  12. Campbell Bonner, Studies in Magical Amulets, Chiefly Graeco-Egyptian (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1950), page 41.
  13. The witnesses on the timeline are quoted from the public-domain translations of Lightfoot and of the Ante-Nicene Fathers. The lines of Ignatius ("begotten and unbegotten"; To Polycarp 3:2) and of Melito are my own close translations from the Greek. Bible quotations: King James Version.